![]() |
|
Battle Abbey and the 1066 Battlefield |
|
On the 14th October 1066, the armies of William of Normandy and Harold of England met on Senlac Ridge for a battle which lasted all day and changed the course of British history. Following his victory, William decided to atone for the slaughter of that day by establishing a monastery free of episcopal control. Four Benedictine monks from Marmoutier were drafted in to form the nucleus of the religious community at the new Battle Abbey. It was consecrated in 1094 and, endowed with lands bequeathed by William, was already the fifteenth richest monastic house in the country. |
|
|
|
During the Hundred Years War, the abbots were the main organisers of resistance to the French raids plaguing the coast, and the fortified gatehouse dates from this troubled period (1338). Income was severely affected by both the wars and the Black Death, which cut the number of monks from 52 to 34. Better times followed in the fifteenth century, allowing for some rebuilding of the cloisters and the abbot’s lodging.
The final Abbot, appointed in 1529, was John Hamond who Thomas Cromwell savagely described as ‘the veriest hayne, beetle and buserde and the arentest chorle that ever I see’ (the lowest clod, stupidest numbskull, and the most out-and-out bumpkin I ever met). Hamond and 18 monks surrendered the Abbey on 27 May 1538, ending 444 years of monastic life. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The subsequent owner was Henry VIII’s Master of the Horse, Sir Anthony Browne, whose son became the first Viscount Montague. The property remained in the family until being sold to Sir Thomas Webster in 1715. The Websters were responsible for the buildings now used as the Abbey School, originally The Webster family retained possession of the Abbey until it was acquired for the nation in 1976 |
|
The Cantiaci TTFF tour started from the Gatehouse and proceeded in an anticlockwise direction. After visiting the exhibition hall which explains the events leading up to the Norman Conquest, we strolled quite leisurely through the undercrofts which lay beneath the demolished Guest Range. The walk at this point was along the line of the Saxon shield wall in 1066. From there we proceeded to the dormitory range, in which vaulted ceilings remain in excellent condition in the Common Room and the Novices Chamber. Beyond this lays the remnants of the Abbey Church, and the site of the High Altar which marks the spot where Harold fell. The crypt, now open to the sky, has been denuded of tombs but the bases of its pillars remain, as do the recesses where the tombs of the abbots would once have stood. An impressive ice house and dairy, built by the Websters in the nineteenth century, stands nearby and a walk along the precinct wall returned us to the Gatehouse, where we took the time to visit the small museum on the first floor. After this we had time for light refreshments at one of Battle’s many welcoming tea-rooms before separating to make our way home through some horrendous showers. report by Mark McManus |
|
|
Time Team Forum Friends
On Saturday May 5th 2001, the Scottish TTFF met up for the first time. We seem to be few and far between north of the border, but at least four of us (including the ubiquitous Co.) had indicated availability for this particular weekend, so we had decided to go ahead and organise something. In view of the Foot and Mouth crisis, we had decided that we would stick to an urban site, and the idea of a visit to Stirling, that most historic of Scottish towns, began to take shape.
The eventual programme was to be a morning visit to Stirling Castle followed by an afternoon at the Bannockburn battlefield.
Note to readers:- if anyone feels like following in our footsteps, try doing it the other way round. We discovered too late that if you pay the entrance fee at Bannockburn, you get a voucher entitling you to 10% off the entry to other Stirling attractions including the Castle!!
|
![]() |
|
So at 10am, on a beautiful sunny morning, we met up at the entrance bridge across the castle moat. Numbers had changed in the last few days before the meet, Alison had come down with a bug, the male contingent of Co.’s family had decided to forsake culture and history for the dubious delights of football in Dundee, and Co.’s Mum had developed a tooth infection (what a birthday present!).
In compensation however we had gained the sister and brother of Pete from Trimontium, Sue and Dominic. So our full roll call read myself (Valerie), and son Joshua, Co., her sister Jacks, Jacks’ daughter Siobhan, Pete from Trimontium, and Sue with Dominic.
|
![]() |
|
We processed across the bridge and went to pay our tickets, before moving on into the main part of the castle. And which cultural highlight did we make for first? – the newly restored Great Hall, the Chapel Royal, the re-constructed Kitchens? No you guessed it – the Coffee shop!!!
It was such a beautiful morning we gathered our refreshments and went outside to sit on the roof terrace and watch the world (or at least the portion of it that had made its way to Stirling that morning!) go by whilst getting to know one another.
We spotted that some of our fellow imbibers (nothing stronger than coffee, honest guv’) were not dressed as we – a redcoat and a highlander with a fine bunnet. So in the cowardly way that all adults have, we sent the youngest member of our party (Siobhan) to go and enquire what they were going to be doing and when!
She reported back that a Jacobite would be doing a presentation at 10.45, and that they would be recruiting in the Inner Courtyard at 11.15. Thus, suitably fortified with both warm drinks and knowledge, we moved on into the main part of the Castle, armed with our guide books, prepared to learn about both mediaeval and 18th century fortifications.
We had barely begun to explore the Castle and had only reached the dazzlingly lime washed Great Hall (which prompted Joshua to remark that it stuck out like a sore thumb and that he didn’t care if that was what it was like originally they should have done it all like that – but he wouldn’t offer to pay for it to be done!) when the redcoat rounded us all up to go and meet the Jacobite.
Seated in an apartment of the Royal Palace, we were held spellbound for the best part of half an hour whilst he related the tale of Bonnie Prince Charlie and Stirling’s part in the ‘45 from the Jacobite point of view. He also gave a demonstration of the use of the highlander’s traditional weapon the claymore (the poor American tourist he used as guinea pig didn’t look too delighted at the prospect of being hacked to death – funny that!)
|
![]() |
Thereafter we were introduced to the delights of the basket-hilted sword, the dirk and targe and the sgian dhu – apparently the claymore was out of fashion by 1745!! Finally he showed us the wearing of the great plaid – the forerunner of the modern kilt – and Siobhan was selected to be dressed in it. She looked absolutely splendid in it.
By this time however we could hear the drums of the recruiting sargeant in the Inner Courtyard, so we moved on out to hear what he had to say for himself. Talking about life as a 19th century soldier in the 93rd Regiment, he spoke of the delights of service overseas, surgery on the injured, drilling (with recruits from the audience – the oldest of whom can only have been 10 – a quick series of left and right face orders left most of them bemused – but not our Siobhan, who was consequently appointed Captain!) and the bayonet charge which Siobhan withstood manfully (girl-fully?).
Time Team Forum Friends
On Saturday 31 May 2003 a small unit of the Cantiaci visited the Hurtwood in Surrey to investigate a track which follows a straight alignment across country between Winterfold (TQ 0664 4325) and Holmbury St Mary (TQ 1020 4404). After several apologies for non-availability, attendees were limited to (Sir) Mark and Ron, who enjoyed a gentle stroll through the Surrey countryside in the warm summer sunshine. The trip began at Winterfold Cottage (TQ 0637 4309) which is adjacent to the course of the Roman road which branches off Stane Street at Rowhook and heads for the temple on Farley Heath. Early OS maps show that the trackway we were investigating extended this far west in the 1870s, but there is now no sign on the ground of this extension. The cottage, which is now hidden behind high hedges and fences (and has been extended at its north end), occupies a substantial area of levelled ground, a rarity in these parts. The 1871 6 inch OS map shows the site of the cottage as a clearing in the forest but no buildings.
We made our way to the point on the alignment where it is occupied by modern tracks.
|
|
Forest Road | Wide footpath |
The first part is a forest road but this soon curves away to the right and the track on the alignment becomes a wide footpath which dips into and out of a shallow valley. | |
|
|
dipping into valley | dipping out of valley |
|
|
At the top it merges into another forest road which curves in from the right, but very soon they part company and a footpath continues straight ahead into a 30 metre deep valley. |
At the bottom it crosses a modern track and then heads up over the spur of a hill, before descending into another valley. | |
|
|
modern track | climbing the slope |
In the bottom of this second valley it leaves what was until recent years Forestry Commission property and climbs the slope as simply a footpath, but at the top of the slope, while remaining legally a footpath it changes form. | |
|
|
Footpath changes form at top of the slope |
Here (TQ 076 435), on a short stretch leading to a road, there is a clear impression of a rounded agger with a metalled surface, with side ditches. The width between the outer faces of the ditches is 7.40 metres and the metalled surface about 5m.
|
|
ditches are initially less pronounced |
slight kink to avoid a patch which is damp |
On the far side of the road this form of construction continues, although the ditches are initially less pronounced . It makes a slight kink to avoid a patch which is damp even in summer (possibly a spring) , then runs straight for 500m in this form . | |
|
|
runs straight for 500m in this form | a stream has cut through the track |
In the middle of this stretch a stream has cut through the track to a depth of 30cm or maybe a channel has been cut to allow water to escape. Near the far end of the stretch the width between the outer faces of the ditches is 8.0 metres. | |
Across the road the track once more becomes a footpath as it descends into another 30m deep valley and then re-emerges onto a forest road at the top on the other side. | |
|
|
track once more becomes a footpath | agger effect is much less pronounced here |
The agger effect is much less pronounced here, which may be due to recent forestry work, but the ditches are still apparent. | |
Beyond this point the track becomes a footpath once more as it starts its descent into a steeply-sided 50 metre deep valley. In places the path has been cut deep by running water | |
![]() |
![]() |
the track becomes a footpath once more | path has been cut deep by running water |
Here it leaves the alignment and cuts across the slope to reach the road at Gasson Farm. The reason for this divergence is to allow the steeper slope on the far side of the valley to be climbed more easily. Even with this device the gradient is still substantial .
|
|
At the top of the climb the track crosses a road and rejoins precisely the same alignment as before Once again, the agger-like form with prominent side ditches is apparent .
![]() |
![]() |
same alignment as before | prominent side ditches is apparent |
At this point the track leaves the alignment. It heads NNE for 200 metres, then takes up a line parallel to its previous alignment. By doing this, it avoids an unnecessary climb over a spur of high ground and instead follows a line which would have passed through the centre of what is now Holmbury St Mary .
|
Holmbury St Mary |
Here the track and the alignment come to an end, and we retired to a local hostelry for badly-needed refreshment. On the way back we decided to visit Holmbury Iron Age hillfort, its banks and ditches still prominent
We then continued over the neighbouring hilltop of Pitch Hill and returned to Winterfold past Ewhurst windmill , pausing to explore the spot where the Rowhook to Farley Heath Roman road emerges onto Winterfold Heath (pic 0488).
![]() |
![]() |
Pitch Hill | Ewhurst windmil |
|
|
Roman road emerges onto Winterfold Heath |
|
|
|
We also explored a substantial terraceway which descends the western scarp slope of Winterfold, leading down into the valley of the Bramley Wey. |
Is the trackway we followed a Roman road?
Well, we concluded that
(1) substantial parts of it display the characteristic shape of an agger with side ditches;
(2) it follows a remarkably straight alignment across very rough and deeply valleyed countryside;
(3) there appears to be no other purpose or function for which a straight track is needed in this area, nor any indication of any sensible way in which it might have been used;
(4) the resumption of the alignment on the far side of a 50 metre deep, steeply-sided valley is especially noteworthy.
An interesting day.
Time Team Forum Friends
Following her first outing with the Cantiaci, Alison was really keen to organise another one, and so she, Shaun, Anne, Bob, Mark and Caz, together with attendant children and later joined by Alison’s friend Andrew and his partner Jackie(sp?), foregathered at Eynsford Castle on 10th August.
The villagers clearly want to keep the castle to themselves, as the entrance is well-hidden down a tiny side street which you’d barely notice, with the tiniest sign you’ve ever seen. Despite being warned about this, I think every one of us missed the turning and had to turn round and come back! Once found, however, the castle was a joy. Built in 1088 over the foundations of what is now believed to be the house of the pre-Conquest lord of the manor, the first thing the visitor sees is the impressive flint outer wall. This was built in two stages and was never battlemented, indicating that this castle was always domestic rather than military. The buildings inside the wall seem to have followed a fairly standard pattern, with an undercroft for storage with a hall, reached by an external staircase, above. The hall, used for eating, meetings and sleeping, led to the solar, the private living quarters for the lord and his family. Unusually, the undercroft beneath the solar formed a self-contained apartment. It had its own entrance, fireplace and well and even its own garderobe (toilet to you and me). Who says granny annexes are a new invention! It is believed to have been used by the bailiff, or some other important member of the household, although most unlikely to have been a member of the family. |
|
|
|
Originally the kitchen was entirely separate, across the courtyard, but following a disastrous fire in the 1200’s a new one was built adjacent to the hall. The old one continued in use until the castle was abandoned in the 1300’s. The abandonment followed a raid in which the castle was sacked, apparently as part of a dispute over the ownership. Evidence has been found of considerable, systematic destruction. A violent end, but it has left ruins which the Cantiaci children had great fun exploring!
Following lunch at the pub (lovely food, pity about all the wasps wanting to share it!), we adjourned to Lullingstone villa.
Like the castle, the villa lies close to the river Darent. The first villa on the site was built of timber in the first century AD. It was later re-modelled in masonry and a large bath-house added. It fell into disrepair in the third century but was rebuilt in the fourth, with beautiful mosaics and wall-paintings. Some of the symbolism in the mosaics and wall-paintings indicates that the owners in this latter phase were Christians.
In the earliest of the stone built phases, the villa had a block of rooms with a verandah running along the front with smaller projecting rooms at each end forming wings. A further corridor/verandah ran along the back. Towards the end of the 1st century the villa was extended, first with new ranges of rooms to the north and south, linked to the original villa by narrow passages and later with a bath-house to the south. During most of the third century the villa, like many others at a time of economic depression in Britain, was neglected but by 275AD times were looking up. The north end was re-modelled again, with three rooms gaining hypocaust (underfloor) heating systems. The baths were also extended. In the mid fourth century the triclinium (dining room) was extended by a semi-circular apse built into the West (rear) verandah. It is in this room, and its extension, that the superb mosaics for which the villa is most famous were laid.
The mosaic in the main room is in the form of a square. In the middle is a cushion-shaped panel showing Bellerophon, riding Pegasus, killing the Chimaera. The four corners of the square are occupied by circular panels (one missing), which depict the four seasons in female form. One, wearing a cloak, is clearly Winter, but the experts disagree on which the other two represent – personally I reckon the one with the swallow on her shoulder is Summer and the one with the garland of corn is Autumn, meaning that Spring is missing – but hey! You pays your money and takes your choice! In the apse, the mosaic shows the Rape of Europa with the lady sitting on the back of Jupiter (in the guise of a bull), looking remarkably carefree about the whole thing and wearing not a lot more than an enigmatic smile. Alongside this part of the villa is a display about how mosaics were made, complete with small tiles and a large table to have a go. Several of the children (and Caz!) found this irresistible.
Our final destination for the day, Lullingstone Castle, lay a 10-minute walk away – most walked but we took the car. (Prams don’t go very well on tracks – that’s our excuse anyway, and we’re sticking to it!) This meant that we were in time to see the wedding party have their final photos taken and leave the church within the grounds. A more idyllic setting its hard to imagine, and they were extremely lucky with the weather – just a few minutes later the heavens opened and the rain lashed down for about 15 minutes. “Castle” is rather a grandiose term for this house which, whilst certainly charming and interesting, is really little more than a grand manor house. It was built by Sir John Peche, a prominent member of the court of Henry VII from early on, and continuing to hold office under Henry VIII. The house was built around 1497, originally with two gatehouses – the one we see today (believed to be one of the earliest brick-built gatehouses in Britain), and an inner one straddling the moat. |
|
![]() |
The latter were both demolished in the mid-18th century to make way for the extensive lawn in front of the house, reputed to be the setting for Sir William Hart Dyke and his friends (including Edward VII when Prince of Wales) devising the rules for lawn tennis which are still followed today.
Substantial parts of the original Tudor house still survive, hidden under the brick façade in which it was clad during the reign of Queen Anne (1702-20 iirc). This façade is beautiful, but the renegade archaeologist in me would love to see it pulled down to reveal the Tudor house inside! |
|
|
|
The rain had left the grounds in a state where us boring adults were less than keen to explore them, but we did venture into the herb garden. This shows signs of severe neglect, to the point where the paths were rapidly disappearing in places. A classic answer to those who ask why archaeology is always buried! | |
Also, as Caz pointed out, a graphic demonstration of how places like Heligan have ‘lost’ gardens. After a final cup of tea at the Visitor centre we dispersed – where next chaps?! |
Time Team Forum Friends
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
Canterbury Cathedral |
||||||||||||||||
Corinne Mills |
Time Team Forum Friends
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
Braehead Prehistoric Settlement Dig |
|||||||||||||||||
By 2.30pm we had all regathered in the Burger King car park at the Braehead retail park. Our problem now was the exact location of the dig. Douglas, the only one of our number to have made a previous visit, was no longer with us. We knew where Ikea was, but it’s a huge construction site – where was the excavation? Fortunately at that moment some construction workers appeared for their lunch and Lorraine volunteered to quiz them. They were in a hurry, but they pointed out the general direction and told us to look out for portacabins. So off we set. It was drizzling, but we were in good spirits. After about 10 minutes we saw some more workmen, one of whom was much taken with my Manchester United shirt! Eventually we realised that we were only a few yards from the entrance to the dig, and we carried on into the enclosure. We were met by a large red-haired digger who directed us into the nearest portacabin where we were invited to view the display panels whilst we waited for our tour of the site.
Andrew began by explaining how the site had been discovered as a cropmark on one of the RAF’s aerial survey photographs, but that nothing had initially been done about it because there was no threat to the site. That threat had eventually emerged with the proposed construction of the new Ikea superstore. As part of the planning process, Glasgow City Council had insisted that an archaeological investigation should take place. First examinations were to establish whether there was in fact a site to investigate since, as Andrew explained, hundreds of years of ploughing can cause cropmarks to creep, meaning that the actual archaeology is not necessarily directly underneath the soil markings! However, in this case a star shape of trial trenches proved that everything was still in place. The shopping centre management then put the contract for the excavation out to tender, and eventually appointed AOC Archaeology to do the work. They made the decision to spend the amount of money allocated on employing as many diggers as possible. This recognized the fact that they had only a limited number of weeks in which to completely strip what was physically a very large site, as well as acknowledging that finds were likely to be few and far between – given the very acidic soil (it eats archaeology was Andrew’s considered opinion), so employing pottery and bone experts to sit and drink tea for weeks on end would probably be counterproductive!
|
Time Team Forum Friends :: Register
Time Team Forum Friends – Registration Agreement Terms | |
---|---|
|
Time Team Forum Friends :: Register
Time Team Forum Friends – Registration Agreement Terms | |
---|---|
|
Time Team Forum Friends :: Register
Time Team Forum Friends – Registration Agreement Terms | |
---|---|
|
Time Team Forum Friends :: Register
Time Team Forum Friends – Registration Agreement Terms | |
---|---|
|